Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Read What KK Had to Say

Author: chandler yergin

Date: 02:05:08 05/23/05

Go up one level in this thread


On May 23, 2005 at 01:10:00, Darrel Briley wrote:

>On May 22, 2005 at 23:34:54, chandler yergin wrote:
>
>>On May 22, 2005 at 23:17:55, Darrel Briley wrote:
>>
>>>On May 22, 2005 at 03:56:43, chandler yergin wrote:
>>>
>>>>On May 21, 2005 at 21:06:21, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On May 21, 2005 at 13:10:11, chandler yergin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On May 21, 2005 at 03:41:19, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On May 21, 2005 at 03:13:00, chandler yergin wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On May 20, 2005 at 20:42:14, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On May 20, 2005 at 19:50:00, chandler yergin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On May 20, 2005 at 18:42:57, Daniel Pineo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On May 20, 2005 at 03:45:37, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On May 20, 2005 at 03:21:34, jefkaan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>On May 19, 2005 at 14:01:43, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Fine, then stop 'asserting' Chess is a Draw!
>>>>It's foolish!
>>>
>>>It seems some of the strongest players of all time stated that chess was
>>>essentially a draw (Lasker, Capablanca etc.)   I think that among the strongest
>>>players it's an accepted fact.
>>
>>Well, it's NOT! The most recent Tournaments prove it!
>>
>> They could literally (barring the occasional
>>>human error) draw every game.
>>
>>No, they couldn't!
>>
>>> But, lucky for us, their opponents either make a
>>>mistake, or they themselves press in an attempt to win, introducing both winning
>>>and losing chances.
>>>
>>>But, as you seem to know better than the great champions, I'll leave you to
>>>believe whatever you wish to believe.  :o)
>>
>>THe 3 time World Correspondence Champion Sanakoev said,
>>"There is NO Opening that could not be played better."
>>But ... I'll leave you to believe in any stupid thing you want.
>
>And an opening being played better has WHAT to do with the subject being
>discussed?

What is the subject being discussed?
That Chess with perfect play is a Draw?
It cannot be proven. That is my point!

 In fact, assuming the statement "There is NO Opening that could not
>be played better" is true, it completely affirms the points I'd made in my post,
>in that both sides could in fact play better, and in so doing, would increase
>the chances for a draw.
>
>It is an accepted premise among strong players that you cannot win without a
>mistake from your opponent; whether that mistake is due to oversight, lack of
>knowledge, or over-pressing in an attempt to win, is in the end, irrelevant.
>
>Irregarless, I do want to thank you for helping me make my point.
>
>But in future, for the sake of your being able to make an effective, logical
>argument, I'd advise you to go back to school and take some logic and critical
>thinking classes.  The fact that you're constantly making personal attacks on
>anyone you don't agree with shows that you lack the facility for making a
>reasoned argument.  Ad hominem attacks on one's opponent are a tried-and-true
>strategy for people who have a case that is weak.  That's really unfortunate,
>but unless you're stupid, closeminded, or a bitter old man too set in his ways
>to learn, and to change, it's a short-coming that can be overcome.  I don't
>believe you're stupid.  I wish you all the best of luck.

Thanks!
Yeah, I'm old and cranky, I've paid my dues, and I won't put up with the
nonsense & Crap from these kids.
I will not let Ignorance,  go unchallenged!



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.