Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Human vs. human "anti-chess" ?

Author: Robert Hollay

Date: 02:50:38 05/23/05

Go up one level in this thread


On May 23, 2005 at 04:42:51, Marc D wrote:

>On May 22, 2005 at 17:16:43, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On May 22, 2005 at 16:45:24, Robert Hollay wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>>If relatively weak players can draw against the top engines, why couldn't an IM
>>>achieve always a draw against a GM? (using the so called "stonewall" technique)
>>>
>>>Robert
>>
>>
>>      Because a GM
>>
>>      a) has a much greater chess knowledge
>>         in all phases of a game than an IM
>>
>>      b) plays usually more precisely than
>>         an IM
>>
>>      c) ... wins for some other reasons
>>
>>      Kurt
>
>Hi Kurt
>
>Is this true for all gm players? or rather the super gms?
>
>does this even count the fresh gm players?
>
>Marc


Are you joking? :-)
Of course he means _average_ IM's and _average_ GM's.
Becoming GM is not a revolution, just an evolution ...

Robert



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.