Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Human vs. human "anti-chess" ?

Author: Claude Le Page

Date: 03:18:36 05/23/05

Go up one level in this thread

For instance , Kasparov was not yet GM when he has beaten Polugaevsky at the
USSR Champonship
But he did it , not by playing "antichess" , but by a TN in one of the pet lines
of Polugaevsky in Najdorf Sicilian
That is he proof that an IM can beat a top level GM just by playing CHESS , not
antichess

• Re: Human vs. human "anti-chess" ? Robert Hollay 03:53:54 05/23/05
  • Re: Human vs. human "anti-chess" ? Uri Blass 04:12:13 05/23/05
    • Re: Human vs. human "anti-chess" ? Robert Hollay 05:10:00 05/23/05
      • Re: Human vs. human "anti-chess" ? Rolf Tueschen 06:37:19 05/23/05
        • Thanks! (NT) :-) Robert Hollay 11:12:33 05/23/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.