Author: Robert Hollay
Date: 03:53:54 05/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 23, 2005 at 06:18:36, Claude Le Page wrote: >For instance , Kasparov was not yet GM when he has beaten Polugaevsky at the >USSR Champonship >But he did it , not by playing "antichess" , but by a TN in one of the pet lines >of Polugaevsky in Najdorf Sicilian >That is he proof that an IM can beat a top level GM just by playing CHESS , not >antichess Yes, I know that. My question was only related to the fact that "antichess" seemed to be an efficient weapon against some strong engines. But I can understand now that it's not so effective against humans. The only puzzle now is how can programmers implement "anti-anti chess" in their engines, and whether it is worth the effort. The opinions vary. Robert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.