Author: Robert Hollay
Date: 05:10:00 05/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
>I do not know if it is not so effective against humans. > >I think that we need to see games of some player who tried antichess against >humans who are slightly better and failed in order to know it. > >games when the difference in rating is more than 200 elo are not interesting >because the stronger player may win by choosing inferior moves that confuse the >opponent. > >Uri :) After reading your post, I must confess that the primary reason for starting this thread was the following crazy idea: IM's are good enough not to be easy fooled by GM's (elo difference less than or around 200). Imagine a tournament with 5 IM's and 5 GM's. All IM's using "antichess" against GM's to achieve a draw. All IM vs IM, and GM vs GM games are "normal chess". If that works, IM's and GM's have equal chances to win the tournament! Of course, this would be too surrealistic to be true ... :-) Robert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.