Author: Dieter Buerssner
Date: 13:27:02 05/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2005 at 16:10:40, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >Dieter, are you using a developmental version of Yace, right? >I tried this position with the linux version of Yace_PB, but it calculates a lot >more nodes to reach the same depth. Also it reports a mate in 20. I used 0.99.87 (very slightly changed, I am pretty sure, it won't make a difference). I did not release that version for Linux. I have created it, and sent it to few people by email. I got zero feedback, and did not test it myself. So, I did not want it to be publically available without any testing. Anyways, what HT size were you using? Did you set "tb_u 4" (for example at the yace prompt before you type analyse. Expect lots of HD noise ...; Yace will not try too hard to find "short" mates, when really good score is already certain. Som HT luck can also be involved. So I of course think, your result is possible. For me, it is not much different, from the result I have shown.) Did you use "bitbases"? At the moment, I cannot try myself. My keyboard broke. I could not get an old fashioned PS2 keyboard conveniently. So I bought an USB keyboard - with the consequence, that I cannot boot Linux anymore. At the time my boot loader starts (Grub), it seems not to be possible, to stear it by the keyboard anymore. (BIOS setup works well with the USB keyboard). I was too lazy, to investigate the problem. Regards, Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.