Author: Darrel Briley
Date: 02:09:45 05/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 25, 2005 at 05:01:47, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 25, 2005 at 04:39:20, Darrel Briley wrote: > >>"Reigning FIDE world champion Rustam Kasimdzhanov is scheduled to play an >>interesting man vs machine match on June 21. The opponent is the "AI Accoona >>ToolBar". The event is being staged by search engine company Accoona, known for >>a number of chess spectaculars in the past and with big chess plans for the >>future. The venue? It's in the middle of Times Square in New York, the >>Crossroads of the World." >> >>"The match is between the 2004 winner of the Tripoli FIDE world championship, >>Rustam Kasimdzhanov of Uzbekistan, and a new kind of chess engine – one that has >>been specifically developed for play against human beings (as opposed to >>countless games against other chess playing computers)." >> >>While there's a plethora of information concerning the Adams/Hydra match, it >>seems there's little information to be found on the details of this match. Is >>there no one here that can shed some light on the hardware/software Kasim will >>be facing and exactly who it is that's been working on its development? Even a >>link (besides the one at Chessbase) would be appreciated. >> >>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2392 > >I read: > >"It is a program that is filled with strategic chess knowledge, rather than >openings and search tricks designed mainly to outplay its electronic opponents." > >I can say only one thing > >Nonsense > >search tricks are designed to play better against everybody and not only against >computers. > >Strategic knowledge(if we do not talk about antisymmetric evaluation) is good >against everybody and not only against humans). > >If humans can beat top programs thanks to better strategic knwoledge there is no >reason that a program will be unable to do the same by the same weapon(in case >that it really has a strategic knowledge). > >I do not say that it is easy to teach programs strategic knowledge but I cannot >believe that strategic knowledge can be good only against humans. > >Uri > >Uri Thanks Uri, but I'd still be interested to learn more about the hardware, the program, and also who it is that has developed it. If none of the great programmers who post here have worked on it, and they don't know who it is, then really, how good can it be? I'm sure it's possible for someone outside the CC world to develop a program, but will it be very strong?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.