Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 16:53:36 02/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 1999 at 18:50:28, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >On February 08, 1999 at 19:27:19, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>Epd acd acn ce bm pm id >>---------------------------------- ---- --------- ------ ------- -------- >>----------- >>8/2k5/4KP2/1Rp5/8/2r5/8/8 w - - 4 990 32680 Rxc5+ Rxc5+ >>MES.0483 > >I don't like these because: > >1) They aren't in EPD. It doesn't do any good to present the EPD in table form >like this, you can't run it unless you convert it to EPD, and that's a pain. >2) They are mostly endgames, which can be resolved with tables. Nobody is going >to find a mate in 27 with search in a KR vs KB ending. You are right, the format stank. I just thought they were interesting because they were so distant (the one above is 87 ply off, for instance). Some of them did have significant node crunching, as evidenced by the high acn. [Not this one obviously with only 990]. In the future I will try to format better and explain the reasoning behind the posts more thoroughly.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.