Author: Tina Long
Date: 17:55:29 02/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 07, 1999 at 10:13:42, Micheal Cummings wrote: <SNIP> >>You should mention your self cooked books in advance >>and not after somebody caught you. >>Everybody knows that you are a strong ChessMaster friend >>and a Rebel enemy. >>So you leave CM as it is but you give your own homebrew >>openings to Rebel, and then you tell everybody that it lost. >>This is not honest policy. Bert > >And I did say this was no SSDF type of game bert, so some people post on here >Rebel 10 games played with Anti gm on or off and never say, most people think >this feature does have a big affect on the program. So I do not see what adding >to the Rebel 10 opening book would do. I am just giving it more options. > >What is wrong with that. Adding to its knowledge I have always thought makes >things smarter not less disadvantaged. Maybe my thinking is wrong. Hi guys, I've come in late, without reading all the thread,it's probably already been said, but I'm impetuous: 1: "not less disadvantaged" now that's a triple negative! 2: "And I did say this was no SSDF type of game.." only after you were caught!! 3: 1.g3 to me is disadvantaged. Plug the first four moves in with CM as white, Rebel black to at least imitate a bit of fairness. Some people make me cranky!! See you guys, Tina Long
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.