Author: Tony Werten
Date: 13:09:10 05/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 25, 2005 at 15:40:14, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On May 25, 2005 at 10:33:32, emerson tan wrote: > >>Why did hydra team chose adams? Leko and kramnik styles seem to more appropriate >>against a computer. Anand is also well adapted to play against a computer. I >>like to see if hydra can defeat Kramnik's berlin wall. Anand keep on exchanging >>pieces against a computer before that with very few materials. it wasnt able to >>create winning chances. > > > Nobody except the Hydra team will know. We can however > expect an interesting match providet Adams plays for > a win. > Kurt Maybe. OTOH it also might be interesting to see if he can draw. Humans that not play for a win seem to be hard to defeat. Humans that not play for a win but recognize a change to win without a danger of losing have the best chance to beat a computer imo. Most humans however seem to forget this strategy after winning 1 game. But still, if Adams can draw any game at will, chessprograms still have a long way to go. Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.