Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 14:02:40 05/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 25, 2005 at 16:17:35, Uri Blass wrote:
>On May 25, 2005 at 16:09:10, Tony Werten wrote:
>
>>On May 25, 2005 at 15:40:14, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>
>>>On May 25, 2005 at 10:33:32, emerson tan wrote:
>>>
>>>>Why did hydra team chose adams? Leko and kramnik styles seem to more appropriate
>>>>against a computer. Anand is also well adapted to play against a computer. I
>>>>like to see if hydra can defeat Kramnik's berlin wall. Anand keep on exchanging
>>>>pieces against a computer before that with very few materials. it wasnt able to
>>>>create winning chances.
>>>
>>>
>>> Nobody except the Hydra team will know. We can however
>>> expect an interesting match providet Adams plays for
>>> a win.
>>> Kurt
>>
>>Maybe. OTOH it also might be interesting to see if he can draw. Humans that not
>>play for a win seem to be hard to defeat.
>>
>>Humans that not play for a win but recognize a change to win without a danger of
>>losing have the best chance to beat a computer imo. Most humans however seem to
>>forget this strategy after winning 1 game.
>>
>>But still, if Adams can draw any game at will, chessprograms still have a long
>>way to go.
>>
>>Tony
>
>If Adams can draw any game at will then I can congratulate him for solving
>chess.
>
>Uri
A GM should almost in every game be able to draw vs
computers as in over 90 % of all openings, there are lines
to simplify matters and to reach a boring game I think.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.