Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 16:46:47 05/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 25, 2005 at 18:29:48, Sally Weltrop wrote: >On May 25, 2005 at 10:33:32, emerson tan wrote: > >>Why did hydra team chose adams? Leko and kramnik styles seem to more appropriate >>against a computer. Anand is also well adapted to play against a computer. I >>like to see if hydra can defeat Kramnik's berlin wall. Anand keep on exchanging >>pieces against a computer before that with very few materials. it wasnt able to >>create winning chances. > >Adams is a strong player BUT IMO they should have sought a higher profile player >like Anand, Shirov,Polgar, OR Kasparov which would be the ultimate draw. My guess: 1 Kasparov, Garry g RUS 2812 12 1963-04-13 (Retired) 2 Anand, Viswanathan g IND 2785 25 1969-12-11 (Probably refused or wanted too much) 3 Topalov, Veselin g BUL 2778 25 1975-03-15 (Probably refused or wanted too much) 4 Leko, Peter g HUN 2763 25 1979-09-08 (Probably refused or wanted too much) 5 Kramnik, Vladimir g RUS 2753 13 1975-06-25 (Probably refused or wanted too much) 6 Ivanchuk, Vassily g UKR 2739 17 1969-03-18 (Probably refused or wanted too much) 7 Adams, Michael g ENG 2737 25 1971-11-17 (Probably inked a deal to both parties liking) 8 Polgar, Judit g HUN 2732 13 1976-07-23 (Would have been next)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.