Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 20:33:20 02/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 1999 at 20:55:29, Tina Long wrote: >On February 07, 1999 at 10:13:42, Micheal Cummings wrote: > > >>>You should mention your self cooked books in advance >>>and not after somebody caught you. >>>Everybody knows that you are a strong ChessMaster friend >>>and a Rebel enemy. >>>So you leave CM as it is but you give your own homebrew >>>openings to Rebel, and then you tell everybody that it lost. >>>This is not honest policy. Bert >> >>And I did say this was no SSDF type of game bert, so some people post on here >>Rebel 10 games played with Anti gm on or off and never say, most people think >>this feature does have a big affect on the program. So I do not see what adding >>to the Rebel 10 opening book would do. I am just giving it more options. >> >>What is wrong with that. Adding to its knowledge I have always thought makes >>things smarter not less disadvantaged. Maybe my thinking is wrong. > >Hi guys, >I've come in late, without reading all the thread,it's probably already been >said, but I'm impetuous: >1: "not less disadvantaged" now that's a triple negative! >2: "And I did say this was no SSDF type of game.." only after you were caught!! >3: 1.g3 to me is disadvantaged. Plug the first four moves in with CM as white, >Rebel black to at least imitate a bit of fairness. > >Some people make me cranky!! > >See you guys, >Tina Long First of all tina I did not think there was a situation in which to be caught out on ? And I am not doing this to post "Wow look at CM6K kick rebels ass" I have explained all this in the other threads tina, you should have read them, you are just adding more insult to something that was a plain misunderstanding. This was an experiment and that is all this is, if you want to come in now and say that this was me trying to put past fellow members some type of scam, then you are way off !!!!!! Plus I would like to know what is making you so cranky Tina. As you said "I've come in late, without reading all the thread,it's probably already been said, but I'm impetuous" I suggest you not be in future, because I am just having to repeat myself over to you again. your first two comment I will ignore because they are just plain rubbish. As for the third well I already know this, If CM6K can play this opening my interest was to see how Rebel 10 would play this opening and how well its engine would perform. You can take or leave these types of games if you like, Plus I do not appreciate you throwing doubt onto my morality and values of being an honest person. Regards Micheal P.S but you are a fellow Aussie are you not, so I will forgive you your deeds this time.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.