Author: Tony Werten
Date: 02:25:00 05/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 25, 2005 at 16:17:35, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 25, 2005 at 16:09:10, Tony Werten wrote: > >>On May 25, 2005 at 15:40:14, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On May 25, 2005 at 10:33:32, emerson tan wrote: >>> >>>>Why did hydra team chose adams? Leko and kramnik styles seem to more appropriate >>>>against a computer. Anand is also well adapted to play against a computer. I >>>>like to see if hydra can defeat Kramnik's berlin wall. Anand keep on exchanging >>>>pieces against a computer before that with very few materials. it wasnt able to >>>>create winning chances. >>> >>> >>> Nobody except the Hydra team will know. We can however >>> expect an interesting match providet Adams plays for >>> a win. >>> Kurt >> >>Maybe. OTOH it also might be interesting to see if he can draw. Humans that not >>play for a win seem to be hard to defeat. >> >>Humans that not play for a win but recognize a change to win without a danger of >>losing have the best chance to beat a computer imo. Most humans however seem to >>forget this strategy after winning 1 game. >> >>But still, if Adams can draw any game at will, chessprograms still have a long >>way to go. >> >>Tony > >If Adams can draw any game at will then I can congratulate him for solving >chess. I fail to see the logic in this. The fact that Adams can draw me at will doesn't mean he has solved chess does it ? But when he can draw Hydra it does ? Tony > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.