Author: Matthias Gemuh
Date: 02:14:57 05/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 27, 2005 at 17:21:42, Thomas Mayer wrote: >Hi Alex, > >> Or strange legal positions like this mate in 1: >> >> 1QqQqQq1/r6Q/Q6q/q6Q/B2q4/q6Q/k6K/1qQ1QqRb w - - 0 1 >> >> Crafty calculates in the background and gives no output, like Fafis. > >this one does not proof anything. The engine is simply lost in the qsearch. This >happens to most engines which a) do not restrict qsearch to a specific depth >(correct for most - e.g. Fritz... :) and b) do not check for input during the >qsearch, which is also true for most engines. > >The other stuff makes one at least quite suspicious, but it's not yet fully >convincing. I wonder what the other programmers think about that. > >Greets, Thomas Hi Thomas, when compiling Quark, do you obfuscate as Fafis does ? Why should a hobby engine need that ? Matthias.
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.