Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Obfuscation of Fafis

Author: Matthias Gemuh

Date: 02:14:57 05/28/05

Go up one level in this thread

On May 27, 2005 at 17:21:42, Thomas Mayer wrote:

>Hi Alex,
>> Or strange legal positions like this mate in 1:
>> 1QqQqQq1/r6Q/Q6q/q6Q/B2q4/q6Q/k6K/1qQ1QqRb w - - 0 1
>> Crafty calculates in the background and gives no output, like Fafis.
>this one does not proof anything. The engine is simply lost in the qsearch. This
>happens to most engines which a) do not restrict qsearch to a specific depth
>(correct for most - e.g. Fritz... :) and b) do not check for input during the
>qsearch, which is also true for most engines.
>The other stuff makes one at least quite suspicious, but it's not yet fully
>convincing. I wonder what the other programmers think about that.
>Greets, Thomas

Hi Thomas,
when compiling Quark, do you obfuscate as Fafis does ?
Why should a hobby engine need that ?

This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.