Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 07:46:48 05/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 27, 2005 at 18:02:25, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 27, 2005 at 17:54:57, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: > >> >>Hello Thomas >>I would like to see playing into playchess engines room, to Dr. Robert Hyatt >>engines. >>For me is a problem to play into ICC because I have not premoves into ICC, and >>as a guest if there are disconnection immediately I will be lost. >>I would like to play a challenger (just for fun and for testing engines to be >>better engines and of course me too) into playchess against Crafty from Dr >>Robert Hyatt and against Quark, if could be possible into main room better for >>everyone. >>Unique way for me to discover new ways will be playing in long time controls. >>This has been a dream for me Thomas. >>Best regard, >>Pablo > >If I understand correctly >I understand that engines lose on time automatically at move 257 in playchess >and that this problem is not engine problem but interface problem. > >I think that if this problem is not fixed then engines suffer from unfair >conditions in playchess. > >Uri It seems that maybe you don't understand the technique. A human with pre-move (and just enough lag) will always win a closed position on time if the game is long enough - regardless of time control (as long as there is no increment), and regardless of anything that happens on move 257. Vas
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.