Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: The same is true of Symbolic

Author: Steven Edwards

Date: 11:18:02 05/28/05

Go up one level in this thread

On May 28, 2005 at 13:42:22, Matthew Hull wrote:

>I find that ICC ratings move around so quickly that such anomalies are soon
>corrected.  FICS ratings seem much more "stable" and don't seem to move as much,
>especially if you play lots of games.

You may be correct, but there is still the issue of avoidng the rewarding of
cheating.  Also, after a loss to a cheater it may take several games against
noncheaters to restore Symbolic's rating.  That's a waste of time and
electricity as well as presenting an artificially low rating to noncheaters.

• Re: The same is true of Symbolic Matthew Hull 12:46:44 05/28/05
  • Re: The same is true of Symbolic Pallav Nawani 21:31:17 05/28/05
    • Re: The same is true of Symbolic Steven Edwards 22:23:34 05/28/05
  • Re: The same is true of Symbolic Steven Edwards 13:51:54 05/28/05
    • Re: The same is true of Symbolic Matthew Hull 14:40:50 05/28/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.