Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 08:42:16 05/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
Err - you confuse all these topics if you claim that someone has the duty to prove his innocense. No. It's the other way round. If you have suspicions then prove them. Months ago I read that this is a do-able job. But what A. Schmidt has presented is NOT already the proof. Nothing more nothing less. (To your obsession about my files-download for Terry: if I download that stuff and pay for it, and then send the whole data without owning or playing that myself, is it still illegal in your view? If not you should apologize because I didn't even send the data until this moment. And I wouldn't do it if it were illegal. But that I could replace someone else should be forbidden? Well, Law is often contrary to a human mind.)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.