Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: How is Hydra faster and better than Deep Blue?

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 10:37:55 05/30/05

Go up one level in this thread

On May 30, 2005 at 11:27:46, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>>>But which also reduces EBF. You should have left out this paragraph.
>>
>>SE definitely INCREASES the EBF.
>>
>>--
>>GCP
>
>Generally, even bad extensions reduce the EBF.

Why would they? That makes no sense.

>The only way I can think that could happen is if some type of redundant searching
>is going on.

SE needs a lot of extra searching to establish singularity.

>Thank you for reinforcing my disinterest in SE.

It's possible to do better than the DB implementation/method.

--
GCP

• Re: How is Hydra faster and better than Deep Blue? Jeremiah Penery 18:46:46 05/31/05
  • Re: How is Hydra faster and better than Deep Blue? Robert Hyatt 14:25:18 06/01/05
    • Re: How is Hydra faster and better than Deep Blue? Jeremiah Penery 19:51:24 06/01/05
      • Re: How is Hydra faster and better than Deep Blue? Robert Hyatt 07:27:58 06/02/05
• Re: How is Hydra faster and better than Deep Blue? Ricardo Gibert 14:55:57 05/30/05
  • Re: How is Hydra faster and better than Deep Blue? Robert Hyatt 22:11:41 05/30/05
  • Re: How is Hydra faster and better than Deep Blue? Gian-Carlo Pascutto 15:31:05 05/30/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.