Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 14:55:57 05/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2005 at 13:37:55, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On May 30, 2005 at 11:27:46, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >>>>But which also reduces EBF. You should have left out this paragraph. >>> >>>SE definitely INCREASES the EBF. >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >>Generally, even bad extensions reduce the EBF. > >Why would they? That makes no sense. Extentions are a form of selective search. Why shouldn't they? > >>The only way I can think that could happen is if some type of redundant searching >>is going on. > >SE needs a lot of extra searching to establish singularity. > >>Thank you for reinforcing my disinterest in SE. > >It's possible to do better than the DB implementation/method. > >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.