Author: stuart taylor
Date: 16:28:38 05/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2005 at 18:50:56, gerold daniels wrote: >On May 30, 2005 at 09:12:23, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On May 30, 2005 at 05:33:17, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On May 29, 2005 at 21:00:19, stuart taylor wrote: >>> >>>>If so, is this because they think they can get much more than other companies >>>>because they beat Kasparov? Or are there other good things about IBM? >>>>S.Taylor >>> >>>Rumor has it that they are almost indestructible. >>>I could imagine if you are on the road that this factor is not to be >>>underestimated. >>> >>>All people that I know off that got an IBM laptop do seem to think they got >>>their money's worth. >>> >>>I don't own one myself. >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >>In what way, indestructable? The inner works? Which? >>S.Taylor > >they are about the best made. you pay for a good product. don,t mean you can >drop it on the floor. the inner works last longer than any i have used :-) > >gerold. hmmmm I gave up trying to get an IBM in favour of an Intel laptop. Do you think that will not be so good? (It's quite a bit cheaper for its specs, than IBM. So is HP) S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.