Author: Tony Werten
Date: 22:39:03 05/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2005 at 19:51:44, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On May 30, 2005 at 19:18:16, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: > >>Dr Robert Hyatt >>My own experience playing by myselft as a human being against Hydra in 2005 have >>been an engine with a middle of 74,500 to 110,000 KN/s. I had two draws 10+10. >>Best regard, >>Pablo > > > >I do not understand those speeds, they seem to be outside the numbers I have >seen reported recently. It's the software search. Hardware nodes aren't counted but guestimated. Assuming a ebf of 6 and knowing (from conversations with Chrilly) it is doing 2 to 3 ply searches in hardware (depending on nodetype) you come to 14 Mn/s without quiescence nodes (wich would probably double this number). Tony > > >> >>On May 30, 2005 at 16:08:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On May 30, 2005 at 02:02:49, Amir wrote: >>> >>>>Deep Blue could calculate 200 million moves per second. According to what I have >>>>read, Hydra calculates 40 million moves per second. How then is Hydra sees >>>>deeper or is faster than Deep Blue, as is claimed by the authors?? >>> >>> >>>Lots of hyperbole, obviously. >>> >>>Maybe he should spend more time searching for poor photos of dead soldiers and >>>less time writing this kind of stuff???
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.