Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:13:14 05/31/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 31, 2005 at 01:39:03, Tony Werten wrote: >On May 30, 2005 at 19:51:44, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On May 30, 2005 at 19:18:16, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: >> >>>Dr Robert Hyatt >>>My own experience playing by myselft as a human being against Hydra in 2005 have >>>been an engine with a middle of 74,500 to 110,000 KN/s. I had two draws 10+10. >>>Best regard, >>>Pablo >> >> >> >>I do not understand those speeds, they seem to be outside the numbers I have >>seen reported recently. > >It's the software search. Hardware nodes aren't counted but guestimated. > >Assuming a ebf of 6 and knowing (from conversations with Chrilly) it is doing 2 >to 3 ply searches in hardware (depending on nodetype) you come to 14 Mn/s >without quiescence nodes (wich would probably double this number). > >Tony > Right. But 14M is _far_ from 110M as quoted above... >> >> >>> >>>On May 30, 2005 at 16:08:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On May 30, 2005 at 02:02:49, Amir wrote: >>>> >>>>>Deep Blue could calculate 200 million moves per second. According to what I have >>>>>read, Hydra calculates 40 million moves per second. How then is Hydra sees >>>>>deeper or is faster than Deep Blue, as is claimed by the authors?? >>>> >>>> >>>>Lots of hyperbole, obviously. >>>> >>>>Maybe he should spend more time searching for poor photos of dead soldiers and >>>>less time writing this kind of stuff???
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.