Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: biased

Author: Cesar Contreras

Date: 08:24:14 05/31/05

Go up one level in this thread


First i like to note your courage to accept your mistake.

I like people to note how easy and evidence it's accepted when the jury it's
biased.

The evidence it's here:

http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?428577

And it's very easyly accepted here:

http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?428584

In the other hand, fafis got a Virus and guess what, some people declared that
he intentionally packed that virus:

http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?428537

I'm not telling they all are trying to damage Rafael. I do think (maybe wrong)
that people it's biased since Fafis got stronger. I think it's some kind of
psicological thing.

If you clearly think that a people it's guilty, every evidence suporting this
it's just accepted.

And again as an engine author myself, i think that the rest of the
(whole)evidence it's not conclusive. I'm still mad how with this inconclusive
evidence Rafael got forced to show his source.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.