Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:42:11 06/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 01, 2005 at 09:33:09, Mike Hood wrote: >On May 30, 2005 at 02:02:49, Amir wrote: > >>Deep Blue could calculate 200 million moves per second. According to what I have >>read, Hydra calculates 40 million moves per second. How then is Hydra sees >>deeper or is faster than Deep Blue, as is claimed by the authors?? > >It's pure speculation. Both Hydra and Deep Blue have their fans, so there will >never be an agreement. Deep Blue was faster, doubtless, but chess programming >algorithms have improved since Deep Blue's days. My personal opinion? I just >don't know. > >There's only one way to resolve the issue. Hydra's programmers should challenge >Deep Blue to a match, giving IBM adequate time to reassemble the machine. If >Deep Blue fails to accept the challenge, Hydra can claim victory by default. By this reason every program can claim win by default against Deep Blue. Deep Blue stopped to play chess and not other programs. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.