Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 07:39:41 06/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 01, 2005 at 08:57:53, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote:
>Hello.
>(With all respect)
>
>I have two stakes.
>
>1o- I to stake that GM Adams won’t be wining one game against Hydra.
This is pure speculation ... but we shall soon know
the truth -:)
Kurt
>
>The way that GM Kasparov and Kramnik have used in the challengers against
>engines they have played, was a wrong strategic way.
The way Kramnik did in the first games was a good one.
Had he continued in the same manner instead of going
at tactics, he would easily have won the match.
Kurt
>
>For me with all respect they are not leaders in the battle man Vs machine
>combat.
Who are the leaders in this battle?
Kurt
>
>And If GM Adams will be running for the same way, he will be losing the match
>without victories.
>
>It is time to see other way in the battle man ms machine, the opportunity too
>see to GM Adams out of the mistake-way that last man Vs machine tournaments have
>walked.
Most people simply want to see an interesting match without
the very boring anti-computer-strategy I think.
Kurt
>
>2o And I stakes: For the human beings since 1300 Fide elo until 2820 elo, or
>without elo, that plays for fun, will be easy draw the top engines in the next
>20 years, and in some case beating, for every human beings that play out of the
>ways mistake of Orthodox Chess.
Are we able to guess what will happen in chess during the
next 20 years? I very much doubt.
Kurt
>
>Just a few Smart Human beings and chess computers programmers like Dr Robert
>Hyatt and Thomas Mayer are taking seriously that engine problem.
>
>Best regard,
>
>Pablo
>Note.
>If Adams played a traditional chess will be into the suicide strategy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.