Author: Madhavan
Date: 09:26:02 06/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 01, 2005 at 09:42:11, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 01, 2005 at 09:33:09, Mike Hood wrote: > >>On May 30, 2005 at 02:02:49, Amir wrote: >> >>>Deep Blue could calculate 200 million moves per second. According to what I have >>>read, Hydra calculates 40 million moves per second. How then is Hydra sees >>>deeper or is faster than Deep Blue, as is claimed by the authors?? >> >>It's pure speculation. Both Hydra and Deep Blue have their fans, so there will >>never be an agreement. Deep Blue was faster, doubtless, but chess programming >>algorithms have improved since Deep Blue's days. My personal opinion? I just >>don't know. >> >>There's only one way to resolve the issue. Hydra's programmers should challenge >>Deep Blue to a match, giving IBM adequate time to reassemble the machine. If >>Deep Blue fails to accept the challenge, Hydra can claim victory by default. > >By this reason every program can claim win by default against Deep Blue. >Deep Blue stopped to play chess and not other programs. oh what a smart guy! well,what if Hydra goes on and on winning all computer event beating junior and other well known programs? ICGA can hold such a match,hydra will be decided winner by default same as Kasparov vs Rustam,except that Kasparov delayed. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.