Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:38:36 06/02/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 02, 2005 at 14:19:35, Peter Skinner wrote: >On June 02, 2005 at 13:55:31, Michael Diosi wrote: > >>Also the compressor of Fafis 2.0 is known and is not a binder. Molebox was used. > >MoleBox _is_ a binder that combines exe, dll, among other files together without >damaging the original file. It can also compress/encrypt the file, and install >without decompressing. > >http://www.molebox.com/ <-- read it. It _is_ a binder. > >>2) http://f27.parsimony.net/forum67828/messages/1565.htm means that the correct >>source was not given >> for inpection and even then is still exceptionally similar to Crafty. >> >>3) He wanted to sell this as beeing HIS work! > >Fine. Then Fafis is a clone. I still _highly_ doubt Rafael would purposely put a >worm in his own file. There is no logic to it. There is no claim that Rafael did it. The claim is only that the person who compiled Fafis did it because the worm can only be inside the exe before compilation. Nobody claimed to know that Rafael compiled Fafis. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.