Author: Steve B
Date: 02:59:12 06/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
> >That said it is almost unbelievable that the Resurrection fell for that. >Especially when you consider the Resurrection is running at over six times >faster than the Tasc and over 10 times faster than the Atlanta! >I am beginning to think the the current program the Resurrection uses (Ruffian) >is better suited to very fast hardware and when run at slower speeds flaws show >up (which would be corrected at faster speeds and higher ply). Deep Sjeng will be added to the Res in August 05 i know nothing of this engine i knew nothing of Ruffian before i started playing it in the Res your thoughts on how DS will do in the Res? >Well done thanks Clive but you and i both know this was a silly blunder by the Res i can hold my own against most of my higher rated computers without being given a gift like this it pays to repeat.. that on level ..Game 10 and the default level (15 sec per move)the Res avoids the blunder i have also played dozens of Blitz games with the Res and got crunched but its human nature to post only ones wins its something similar to the 1964 Exhibition tour Fischer gave in the US where he barnstormed the US from coast to coast many of those games were lost but practically all of his loses and draws(what few there were )survived you get crunched by the visiting GM you dont exactly keep the game score under lock and key for 40 years you manage to eek out a draw or even a win and you save that score to show to your grandchildren great book btw..Fischer On The Road(by Donaldson)..second Edition just released Steve
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.