Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CEGT statistics

Author: gerold daniels

Date: 08:01:13 06/04/05

Go up one level in this thread


On June 04, 2005 at 10:42:04, Christian Koch wrote:

>Here the overall ELO differences within CEGT for AMD and P4 systems after more
>than 16000 games. Have a close look at ZAPPA.
>
>                  	AMD	 P4	difference
>
>Shredder 9        	2750	2750	   0
>Fritz 8           	2712	2699	- 13
>Junior 9          	2688	2702	  14
>Hiarcs 9          	2666	2677	  11
>Gandalf 6.0       	2647	2678	  31
>Chess Tiger 15.0  	2652	2643	-  9
>CM 10000 Steadfast	2642	2658	  16
>Ktulu 7.0         	2638	2666	  28
>Ruffian 2.1.0     	2626	2652	  26
>List 512          	2623	2636	  13
>Pro Deo 1.1       	2625	2627	   2
>CMX Yoda          	2624	2590	- 34
>Spike 0.9a        	2595	2616	  21
>Fruit 2.0         	2592	2608	  16
>SOS 5 for Arena   	2576	2635	  59
>Pseudo 0.7c       	2586	2593	   7
>Deep Sjeng 1.6    	2602	2571	- 31
>Aristarch 4.50    	2582	2594	  12
>SlowChess Blitz WV	2576	2606	  30
>Ktulu 5.1         	2563	2584	  21
>Zappa 1.0         	2543	2624	  81
>Thinker 4.7a      	2565	2565	   0
>Anaconda 2.0.1    	2560	2573	  13
>Glaurung 0.2.3    	2545	2568	  23
>Pharaon 3.2       	2539	2585	  46
>Delfi 4.5         	2552	2538	- 14
>DanChess CCT7     	2536	2577	  41
>AnMon5.50         	2527	2547	  20
>Naum 1.71	        2516	2545	  29
>Patriot 1.3.0     	2513	2512	-  1
>Amyan 1.595       	2492	2519	  27
>Yace 0.99.87      	2500	2456	- 44
>
>best regards,
>Christian

good morning Christian. according to these numbers looks like p4 does better for
the chess engines.question is why.





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.