Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 21:48:24 06/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 05, 2005 at 17:29:37, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>On June 05, 2005 at 15:18:35, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On June 05, 2005 at 15:05:15, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>
>>>On June 05, 2005 at 14:45:37, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>>
>>>>On June 05, 2005 at 12:53:45, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>[D]6n1/3p4/8/1P1Pk1n1/4P3/B5K1/8/8 w - -
>>>>>
>>>>>b6! wins easy, but S9 cannot find it!!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Interesting example to demonstrate that there
>>>> are situations where too much pruning may be
>>>> worse. On the other hand: all other engines
>>>> which find the move b5-b6 within seconds have
>>>> almost no chance to win a match vs Shredder 9.
>>>> The overall playing strength of a program is
>>>> more important than a single position which
>>>> can't be solved -:)
>>>> Kurt
>>>
>>>In my opinion S9 should not only ENG-ENG games win, he should be good for home -
>>>and endgame analysis too! ;)
>>
>> Hi Eduard
>> Just right, but what are you claiming about
>>
>> New game, 180'/40+60'/20+30'
>> 6n1/3p4/8/1P1Pk1n1/4P3/B5K1/8/8 w - - 0 1
>>
>> Analysis by Shredder 9:
>>
>> 1. +- (4.45): 1.b6 Nxe4+ 2.Kh4 Nd6 3.Bxd6+
>> 2. ² (0.54): 1.Bb2+ Kd6 2.Kf4 Nxe4 3.Kxe4 Kc5 4.Bg7 d6 5.Bf8
>>
>> (, MyTown 04.06.2005)
>>
>> As you can see, Shredder 9 has no difficulty in playing
>> the correct move if you use increase the number of
>> analysing lines.
>> Kurt
>
>Hallo Kurt!
>
>Das sollte Shredder auch im 1 Varianden Mode können, nur meine Meinung!
Hallo Eduard
... dagegen hätte ich auch keine Einwände -:)
Gruss
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.