Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 08:45:05 06/07/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 07, 2005 at 11:38:20, Tord Romstad wrote: >Fruit and Crafty are indeed typical choices for engine sources to look at >nowadays. Gerbil and TSCP were typical choices five years ago. I don't see >any reason to recommend looking at them today. Gerbil is a lot newer than Crafty. It didn't even exist 5 years ago! I have to disagree completely here; what you want to look at depends on what you are doing. If you want a chess engine that is instructive and explains how to make one, Gerbil and TSCP were meant for that purpose. Crafty and Fruit are optimized implementations which won't mean anything to a beginner. -- GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.