Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 10:29:43 06/07/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 07, 2005 at 11:45:05, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On June 07, 2005 at 11:38:20, Tord Romstad wrote: > >>Fruit and Crafty are indeed typical choices for engine sources to look at >>nowadays. Gerbil and TSCP were typical choices five years ago. I don't see >>any reason to recommend looking at them today. > >Gerbil is a lot newer than Crafty. It didn't even exist 5 years ago! > >I have to disagree completely here; what you want to look at depends on what you >are doing. I agree, of course. >If you want a chess engine that is instructive and explains how to make one, >Gerbil and TSCP were meant for that purpose. Yes, but there are newer engines built with the same purpose, which achieves the same aim much better. Have a look at Olithink, for instance. Clearer, more compact, and much stronger than Gerbil and TSCP. Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.