Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 03:35:28 06/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 07, 2005 at 14:07:13, Dann Corbit wrote: >On June 07, 2005 at 13:54:26, Tord Romstad wrote: > >>On June 07, 2005 at 13:32:01, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>That's weird -- I had exactly the opposite experience. I never really >>understood >>rotated bitboards before I saw Olithink. I suppose different people just prefer >>to learn in different ways. > >Maybe it's just an impression. I only understood bitboards when I read some >articles about them and never got the idea when I just read some code. > >I got the notion that people would have a hard time understanding Olithink's >bitboards, but maybe I am wrong. It wouldn't surprise me if this is just a question of different ways of learning. I am a mathematician, not a programmer. Something compact, crisp and precise without any noise or superfluous information is ideal learning material for me. Olithink fits the bill perfectly. Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.