Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: The strength rating of the old program Chess 4.8

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 12:51:27 06/11/05

Go up one level in this thread

On June 11, 2005 at 15:45:16, Fernando Villegas wrote:

>Impossible to say for NOW. Ratings are an statiscal measure taken from a
>determinate pool of players competing in a certain moment. Any score you got in
>the 80's has no meaning now.
>Fernando


Actually the rating of Chess 4.x ought to be reasonable, because it was _not_
based on playing other programs.  It was a pure USCF rating earned by playing in
tournament games, just like we did with Cray Blitz, and like Hsu, et al did with
Deep Thought and Berliner with HiTech.

• The strength rating is a non-trivial problem! Rolf Tueschen 04:12:35 06/12/05
  • Re: The strength rating is a non-trivial problem! mike schoonover 18:32:20 06/12/05
  • Re: The strength rating is a non-trivial problem! Robert Hyatt 11:31:29 06/12/05
    • Re: The strength rating is a non-trivial problem! Rolf Tueschen 12:38:48 06/12/05
• Re: The strength rating of the old program Chess 4.8 Fernando Villegas 13:21:51 06/11/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.