Author: Cesar Contreras
Date: 16:42:53 06/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
>What is unclear when we say, it is clear for us using this illegal and also >legal positions as a first step to say where engines are comming from. Maybe as a first step... >program does not understand the rules of chess. well, it's your opinion you already know mine ... >as you can see. But fingerprints are everywhere, nothing can be hidden. What I understand it's that a "fingerprint" it's a BIG SET of legal and ilegal positions aplied to one engine. So you miss to explain how are you going to compare one fingerprint to another, and how you are going to conclude if they are the same or if they are not related at all. I argue about this with you because i think you (both) try to make people believe that your method it's conclusive. The "fingerprint" label it's misused or maybe it's just that you haven't defined it well. Also since this it's going to be used to accuse someone, i think it's a serious thing, not a joke.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.