Author: Madhavan
Date: 01:45:35 06/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 2005 at 04:40:06, Fabien Letouzey wrote: >On June 13, 2005 at 04:31:34, Madhavan wrote: > >>On June 13, 2005 at 04:09:05, Fabien Letouzey wrote: >> >>>On June 13, 2005 at 02:17:54, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>> >>>>On June 12, 2005 at 17:28:37, Dragon wrote: >>>> >>>>>1 AnMon 7.5 >>>>>2 Chess Wizard 7 >>>>>3 Fruit 7 >>>>>4 Dragon 6 >>>>>5 Capture 5.5 >>>>>6 Pharaon 5.5 >>>>>7 Arion 3 >>>>>8 Gaia 2 >>>>>9 BBChess 1 >>>>>10 Soft Jacqueline Bras 0 >>>>> >>>>>More later (pgn, ...) >>>>> >>>>>Bruno >>>> >>>> Thank you for the information. How many rounds >>>> are to go or is the event already over. No homepage? >>>> Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com] >>> >>>Hi Kurt, >>> >>>These are the final standings. >> >>who were the opponents of fruit?loss/draw to whom? >>are you impressed with this result? >>thanks >> >>>Fabien. > >Hi, sorry to disappoint you my friend. what a cool statement you have made,thank you very much! >Fruit lost to AnMon (tactical blunder, but AnMon was a pawn up already) and >Chess Wizard (the result was never in doubt since the opening, Pirc by Fruit). >Fruit should have only drawn the game against Pharaon! I didnt expect this,if only Fruit had been run on a faster hardware,it would have won atleast 2 of these 3 games. I don't know anything about chess wizard?is this a private one? >So Fruit was never in a position to win any of these three games. This cannot >be fully attributed to slower hardware (Fruit was running on an old laptop), so >I am indeed disappointed. why are you disappointed,7/10 is a good result! >Nonetheless, I am confident the Fruit has made some progress and I am going to >start the public-release process (which should last a week or so, sorry for >that) while waiting for independent results. I will see to it.atleast it would bring 50 more elo points,who was the operator there?have you been operating fruit? >Be patient and you will have statistically-significant results. I'm patient! No,No I'm not interested in "statistically-significant results",what i was expecting was that read me file where you would pour out hilarious and funny stuffs :) :) just kidding,all the best! >Fabien.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.