Author: Antonio Dieguez
Date: 12:36:13 06/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 2005 at 04:34:00, Fabien Letouzey wrote: >On June 12, 2005 at 18:42:15, Antonio Dieguez wrote: > >>ha this seems like a joke, reporting that great result with so much naturality. > >Everybody with a bit of experience is aware that it does not prove anything with >so few games. Dann was simply enthusiastic after his test, and wanted to share >it with others. Is it so very wrong? > >BTW, for some reason I don't think Dann would post fake results. However it's >always possible that something went wrong on his computer. This has already >happened in the past ... > >In my own testing Fruit has made some progress but nowhere near as much as Dann >would like to believe (and this has also already happened in the past, but >optimism is not a crime). > >Fabien. in the case you are talking (writting) seriously, in no case I was questioning Dann Corbit, who am I to do that anyway. I did not mean to say "but you have played so few games, what you posted is a joke" or something like that. And I only commented about the amount of games later just as I could have commented other thing, just to fill the lines, as the amount of games was of no importance to my message. Am sorry if I can be miserunderstood (and terribly this time), these things happen :( :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.