Author: Fabien Letouzey
Date: 00:59:08 06/14/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 2005 at 04:45:35, Madhavan wrote: >>Fruit lost to AnMon (tactical blunder, but AnMon was a pawn up already) and >>Chess Wizard (the result was never in doubt since the opening, Pirc by Fruit). >>Fruit should have only drawn the game against Pharaon! >I didnt expect this,if only Fruit had been run on a faster hardware,it would >have won atleast 2 of these 3 games. It's easy to overestimate the impact of hardware. Fruit was maybe twice as slow as it could have, which translates to -50 Elo from what I have read. -50 Elo do not explain everything. Maybe the game with AnMon would have been different (lots of tactics), but I don't think so for the other two. >I don't know anything about chess wizard?is this a private one? Yes, by Frederic Louguet. >why are you disappointed,7/10 is a good result! I've just explained why, it has nothing to do with the final score which is clearly good. >I will see to it.atleast it would bring 50 more elo points,who was the operator >there?have you been operating fruit? Make that "at most" 50 Elo. I operated in most of the games. Since it was the first time, I translated 10+3 into 8+0 for the engine. Not that adding a minute of two would have made any difference. >No,No I'm not interested in "statistically-significant results",what i was >expecting was that read me file where you would pour out hilarious and funny >stuffs :) :) You wouldn't believe how hard it is for me to write readme files. I always postpone it to the very last moment. I think I add jokes into them as a defense mechnism against pain. Fabien.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.