Author: Madhavan
Date: 04:33:26 06/14/05
Go up one level in this thread
>It's easy to overestimate the impact of hardware. Fruit was maybe twice as slow >as it could have, which translates to -50 Elo from what I have read. I hate your hardware >>why are you disappointed,7/10 is a good result! > >I've just explained why, it has nothing to do with the final score which is >clearly good. you didnt correct my "7/10",its 7/9 :) >>I will see to it.atleast it would bring 50 more elo points,who was the operator >>there?have you been operating fruit? > >Make that "at most" 50 Elo. yeah,I cannot wait for a long time to have a new version of fruit.its too late,release it Man! :) >I operated in most of the games. Since it was the first time, I translated 10+3 >into 8+0 for the engine. Not that adding a minute of two would have made any >difference. you operated! >>No,No I'm not interested in "statistically-significant results",what i was >>expecting was that read me file where you would pour out hilarious and funny >>stuffs :) :) > >You wouldn't believe how hard it is for me to write readme files. noone could believe,you have got a great sense of humor,Man! maybe you could write a chess programming book explaining about the code of Fruit with a hilariously funny humor,I will definitely buy the book without giving a thought.when will you publish it? you were sarcastic and you poured insulting remarks about fruit. you insulted fruit :) >I always postpone it to the very last moment. >I think I add jokes into them as a defense mechnism against pain. > >Fabien.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.