Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: this result looks much better IMO :-))

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 09:47:01 06/14/05

Go up one level in this thread

On June 14, 2005 at 10:05:48, Tony Hedlund wrote:

>On June 14, 2005 at 07:45:12, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>
>>[Round "1"]
>>[White "Pro Deo 1.1 A1200"]
>>[Black "Shredder 9 UCI A1200"]
>>[Result "0-1"]
>>[ECO "B84"]
>>[PlyCount "178"]
>>[EventDate "2005.02.17"]
>>[EventType "match"]
>>[EventRounds "5"]
>>[TimeControl "40/7200:40/7200:40/7200"]
>>
>>{1MB, Junior9.ctg, A1200}
>>
>>
>>1 MB ? Junior book ??
>>which program ?? S9 with junior book ? Pro deo with junior book ?! Why ?
>
>Pro Deo with own book and 100 mb hash. According to Ed, it doesn't matter what
>CB-GUI indicates.

This is correct for the hash table size however you should not have a ChessBase
book included for Pro Deo because the CB-interface will first consult the
ChessBase book and play from that before consulting the engine.

Ed

• Re: this result looks much better IMO :-)) Tony Hedlund 03:59:26 06/15/05
  • Re: this result looks much better IMO :-)) Ed Schröder 04:30:36 06/15/05
    • Re: this result looks much better IMO :-)) Gian-Carlo Pascutto 05:20:12 06/15/05
      • Re: this result looks much better IMO :-)) Thorsten Czub 05:41:53 06/15/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.