Author: Andrew Dados
Date: 16:21:16 06/14/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 14, 2005 at 19:04:08, Christopher Conkie wrote: >Hi Andrew, > >Honestly for me at least it should say...... > >1. +- (#3): 1.Rfe7+ Kf8 2.Qxf4+ Kg8 3.Re8# > >If there is a third last move still to be made by anyone , it is #3 not #2. > >If we are to follow your conclusions (down the #2 road) and assume that >something was not broke but meant...... > >Then I cannot see how this can be true also...... > >[D]8/7p/1p4pk/2p2p2/7K/PPRnr3/3R2PP/8 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Comet B68: > >1. -+ (-#1): 35.Rc1 g5# >2. -+ (-#1): 35.Rxc5 g5# >3. -+ (-#1): 35.Re2 g5# >4. -+ (-#1): 35.g3 g5+ 36.Kh3 Nf4# >5. -+ (-#1): 35.Rcc2 g5# >6. -+ (-#1): 35.Rc4 g5# > >Any ideas? > >Christopher It seem consistent. -#0 makes no sense, so (-#1) is 'mated in 1' after I make my move. I had similar discussions with some programmers years ago on icc/fics. PVs are meant to be kibitzed/whispered after a move is made by an engine. So for actual position as we see it on the board it is a 'mate in 2', not in 3. As I said it doesn't make much sense to me either :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.