Author: Vikrant Malvankar
Date: 01:04:19 06/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 2005 at 02:38:07, Madhavan wrote: >On June 15, 2005 at 00:57:05, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On June 15, 2005 at 00:05:51, Tony Nichols wrote: >> >>>On June 14, 2005 at 22:35:26, William Sorin wrote: >>> >>>>On June 14, 2005 at 22:19:29, Mark Ryan wrote: >>>> >>>>>Has this been the wrong metaphor all along? >>>>> >>>>>Years ago, Kasparov predicted that the future of chess was in "Advanced Chess" >>>>>(people playing chess with computer assistance). Now the Freestyle Tournament >>>>>seems to be confirming this prediction. In the words of Chessbase, " ... we can >>>>>draw first tentative conclusions. One is that the most powerful chess playing >>>>>entity on the planet is a GM armed with a computer." >>>>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2453 >>>>> >>>>>We are the tool-manufacturing species. We create the tools, and we shape their >>>>>purpose. In Vancouver, the trains in the SkyTrain system have no drivers, but >>>>>there is a central control room where human beings monitor everything carefully >>>>>and react to unforeseen emergencies. The level of human involvement has been >>>>>reduced, but it is still there; in fact, it has been isolated to a higher level. >>>>> >>>>>No matter how strong the chess machines become, will they always be stronger >>>>>with a GM at the controls? >>>>> >>>>>Mark >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>I wonder then if a 2600 Grandmaster using Fritz could beat any of the Top Ten >>>>human Grandmasters without computer assistance? >>> >>> >>>I would expect a 2600 GM with chessbase and Fritz to crush any human player >>>without. Even at the very top many games are decided by tactical mistakes. Also, >>> the ability to research an opening at the board would be very useful. >>>Regards >>>Tony >> >>I believe Kasparov could defeat a 2600 rated player, even with the assistance of >>a top program and top PC computer, as long as he knows what he's dealing with. > >Excuse me,what exactly is the difference between a 2000 rated player with >computer assistance and a 2600 with the same program running as the first >one?since we are sure both of them were probably going to make all computer >moves Madhavan how u do Analysis with the help of computer(Fritz,Shredder etc.)? Do u agree to what computer shows in a particular position ? or make a move that u find interesting and start finding continuations from thereon with the help of Programs.?
This page took 0.22 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.