Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: this result looks much better IMO :-))

Author: Tony Hedlund

Date: 03:59:26 06/15/05

Go up one level in this thread

On June 14, 2005 at 12:47:01, Ed Schröder wrote:

>On June 14, 2005 at 10:05:48, Tony Hedlund wrote:
>
>>On June 14, 2005 at 07:45:12, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>>
>>>[Round "1"]
>>>[White "Pro Deo 1.1 A1200"]
>>>[Black "Shredder 9 UCI A1200"]
>>>[Result "0-1"]
>>>[ECO "B84"]
>>>[PlyCount "178"]
>>>[EventDate "2005.02.17"]
>>>[EventType "match"]
>>>[EventRounds "5"]
>>>[TimeControl "40/7200:40/7200:40/7200"]
>>>
>>>{1MB, Junior9.ctg, A1200}
>>>
>>>
>>>1 MB ? Junior book ??
>>>which program ?? S9 with junior book ? Pro deo with junior book ?! Why ?
>>
>>Pro Deo with own book and 100 mb hash. According to Ed, it doesn't matter what
>>CB-GUI indicates.
>
>This is correct for the hash table size however you should not have a ChessBase
>book included for Pro Deo because the CB-interface will first consult the
>ChessBase book and play from that before consulting the engine.
>
>Ed

Ok, I'll unload the junior9.ctg book. Do you want me to start all over again?

Tony

• Re: this result looks much better IMO :-)) Ed Schröder 04:30:36 06/15/05
  • Re: this result looks much better IMO :-)) Gian-Carlo Pascutto 05:20:12 06/15/05
    • Re: this result looks much better IMO :-)) Thorsten Czub 05:41:53 06/15/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.