Author: Madhavan
Date: 06:23:23 06/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 16, 2005 at 08:05:05, Terry McCracken wrote: >On June 16, 2005 at 03:47:32, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>Uri > >Thanks Uli...Maybe that 9.6 rule can be challenged by 12.1, however we need a >rule to add to 9.6 so there can be no waffling. His name is Uri not Uli,I dont know what happened to Uli,the physics expert. if you mispell Uri's name again,he will shout at you just like how Guenther did to Dan HoneyCutt http://www.talkchess.com/forums/2/message.html?171689 :) >It isn't that uncommon when players are down to say an obvious draw RKRK and one >player has more time on his clock refuses to draw. It really is bad form and >it shouldn't be permitted. > >I suppose one could argue over RKRB, but only if you happen to have one of those >rare positions that can win, otherwise a draw should be the result and the >opponent should comply, and we need a rule to make him or her comply. > >IMO > >Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.