Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 06:31:16 06/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 16, 2005 at 09:23:23, Madhavan wrote: >On June 16, 2005 at 08:05:05, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On June 16, 2005 at 03:47:32, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>Uri >> >>Thanks Uli...Maybe that 9.6 rule can be challenged by 12.1, however we need a >>rule to add to 9.6 so there can be no waffling. > > >His name is Uri not Uli,I dont know what happened to Uli,the physics expert. >if you mispell Uri's name again,he will shout at you just like how Guenther did >to Dan HoneyCutt > >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/2/message.html?171689 > >:) > Yeah I did slip on his name, Uri and Uli ugh...still there are far worse you could be called:o) Uli is a pretty interesting guy, and I read all or at least most of his posts. Terry >>It isn't that uncommon when players are down to say an obvious draw RKRK and one >>player has more time on his clock refuses to draw. It really is bad form and >>it shouldn't be permitted. >> >>I suppose one could argue over RKRB, but only if you happen to have one of those >>rare positions that can win, otherwise a draw should be the result and the >>opponent should comply, and we need a rule to make him or her comply. >> >>IMO >> >>Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.