Author: Madhavan
Date: 09:26:56 06/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 16, 2005 at 10:15:57, Günther Simon wrote: >On June 16, 2005 at 09:23:23, Madhavan wrote: > >>On June 16, 2005 at 08:05:05, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>On June 16, 2005 at 03:47:32, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>Thanks Uli...Maybe that 9.6 rule can be challenged by 12.1, however we need a >>>rule to add to 9.6 so there can be no waffling. >> >> >>His name is Uri not Uli,I dont know what happened to Uli,the physics expert. >>if you mispell Uri's name again,he will shout at you just like how Guenther did >>to Dan HoneyCutt >> >>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/2/message.html?171689 >> >>:) > >What are you talking about? It seems you completely missunderstood Dan >and also cannot follow his advice? >Will there be any thread in the future where you won't try to bash >my name? > I am a very kind and friendly person, this exists only in your head. > I just don't like persons >who troll and spam, but all your actions go into that direction. I understood what he said,I tried to show what kind of character you reflect. didnt you accuse me of using multiple accounts? >You post > 100 posts per week it seems and in at least 10% of them you >somehow disrespectfully mention my name - either you stop this finally, >as Dan has adviced, or there will be more serious consequences. whats your problem with my post?if you don't like it,just ignore them,if you say you are a kind person.I have never seen a kind person(like Fabien)accuse somebody of having a multiple account. >For the record - I never shouted at Dan and I would never correct >little misspellings, what you like to do very often. >This is one sign of immaturity Dan was talking about BTW, don't always >try to correct people, especially don't always give opinions on things >you are no expert in. you need to show some maturity good bye >Guenther > >P.S. I hope you won't post again 20:1 posts after this. I will,Buzz off.dont fool around. > >> >>>It isn't that uncommon when players are down to say an obvious draw RKRK and one >>>player has more time on his clock refuses to draw. It really is bad form and >>>it shouldn't be permitted. >>> >>>I suppose one could argue over RKRB, but only if you happen to have one of those >>>rare positions that can win, otherwise a draw should be the result and the >>>opponent should comply, and we need a rule to make him or her comply. >>> >>>IMO >>> >>>Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.