Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Date: 11:37:47 06/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 16, 2005 at 12:59:05, Darrel Briley wrote: >On June 16, 2005 at 04:43:16, Joel wrote: > >>Hi Tom, >> >>I feel the same way. I like the fact 'bodo' on ICC has played something like >>10,000 games, most of them against humans. >> >>If someone wants to play 20 straight games, and then get 200 ratings points off >>me by exploiting a flaw, well...I see it as a problem with my engine, not the >>player. >> >>Joel > > >I think ICC's rules are designed to protect the integrity of human ratings. If >you have a few individuals playing computers over and over and exploiting known >and unknown weaknesses to gain inordinate amounts of rating points, then it >skews the rating system. > >At the same time, the computer accounts that play only humans are doing they >same thing, but since they are computer accounts ICC doesn't seem to care. > > DB Hallo DB In my humble opinion, ICC´rules are designed to protect the false integrity of hight general Top human and Top machines Elo, against the truth. ICC general hight elo is a joke where are going to be losting many people that could beat many times the engines. Is there at lest one many serious reason when engines to avoid be playing against people that could beat them ? Sure ...to be careful of the elo. If ICC engines open formula, I could be in 3500 elo in one week playing against engines into ICC. Now how that is absolutly truth, ICC will be banned everyone that beat engines across anticomputer technique. The "pandora box" have been opened, and the unique way to destroy the "pandora box" is writing ilogical rules. Best regard, Pablo Best regard, Pablo Best regard, Pablo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.