Author: Vikrant Malvankar
Date: 23:15:34 06/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 16, 2005 at 06:19:03, Madhavan wrote: >On June 15, 2005 at 04:04:19, Vikrant Malvankar wrote: > >>On June 15, 2005 at 02:38:07, Madhavan wrote: >> >>>On June 15, 2005 at 00:57:05, Terry McCracken wrote: >>> >>>>On June 15, 2005 at 00:05:51, Tony Nichols wrote: >>>> >>>>>On June 14, 2005 at 22:35:26, William Sorin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On June 14, 2005 at 22:19:29, Mark Ryan wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Has this been the wrong metaphor all along? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Years ago, Kasparov predicted that the future of chess was in "Advanced Chess" >>>>>>>(people playing chess with computer assistance). Now the Freestyle Tournament >>>>>>>seems to be confirming this prediction. In the words of Chessbase, " ... we can >>>>>>>draw first tentative conclusions. One is that the most powerful chess playing >>>>>>>entity on the planet is a GM armed with a computer." >>>>>>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2453 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>We are the tool-manufacturing species. We create the tools, and we shape their >>>>>>>purpose. In Vancouver, the trains in the SkyTrain system have no drivers, but >>>>>>>there is a central control room where human beings monitor everything carefully >>>>>>>and react to unforeseen emergencies. The level of human involvement has been >>>>>>>reduced, but it is still there; in fact, it has been isolated to a higher level. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>No matter how strong the chess machines become, will they always be stronger >>>>>>>with a GM at the controls? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Mark >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>I wonder then if a 2600 Grandmaster using Fritz could beat any of the Top Ten >>>>>>human Grandmasters without computer assistance? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>I would expect a 2600 GM with chessbase and Fritz to crush any human player >>>>>without. Even at the very top many games are decided by tactical mistakes. Also, >>>>> the ability to research an opening at the board would be very useful. >>>>>Regards >>>>>Tony >>>> >>>>I believe Kasparov could defeat a 2600 rated player, even with the assistance of >>>>a top program and top PC computer, as long as he knows what he's dealing with. >>> >>>Excuse me,what exactly is the difference between a 2000 rated player with >>>computer assistance and a 2600 with the same program running as the first >>>one?since we are sure both of them were probably going to make all computer >>>moves >> >>Madhavan how u do Analysis with the help of computer(Fritz,Shredder etc.)? > >Run "Infinite analysis",you have to makea move for both white and black,see the >evaluation.if the evaluatiuon of particular side is getting low,change the >engine and repeat the moves. > >engines show different evaluation. do u rely entirely on engine's evaluation? do u think the best engines are perfect in evaluation? > >>Do u agree to what computer shows in a particular position ? or make a move that >>u find interesting and start finding continuations from thereon with the help of >>Programs.?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.