Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:51:05 06/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 17, 2005 at 05:19:33, Robert Hollay wrote: >On June 16, 2005 at 17:36:27, Marc Lacrosse wrote: > >>Hello all >> >>I would like to get help and opinions regarding the design of a large >>all-play-all tournament that I intend to launch. >> >>At first sight, I intend to invite the following free engines : >>- Fruit Massy 2005 >>- Fruit 2.0 >>- TogaII 0.93 >>- ProDeo 1.1 >>- Spike 0.9a >>- SlowChess WV blitz >>- Zappa 1.0 >>- Aristarch 4.5 >>- Anmon Massy 5.5.3 >>- List 512 UCI >>- Pharaon 3.2 >>- SOS 5.1 >>- Ruffian 1.05 >> >>First question : Did I miss some strong free engine ? >> > >Yes, you _did_ miss quite a few strong free engines. By the way, AnMon 5.5.3 >Massy does not seem as strong as big was the dust it raised. >Maybe at longer time controls ... >This morning has finished my AnMon Massy 5.3.3 Gauntlet tournament >(30m+15s blitz, 1.8GHz Athlon, 64MB hash, own books - except Toga 2). > >Of course, 30 games are not enough to draw a conclusion, still only 33% ... >The results: > > Engine Score AnMon >1: AnMon 553 Massy 10.0/30 ······ >2: Crafty 18.15 5.5/6 =11111 !!! >3: SlowChessBlitz WV 4.5/6 11=110 >4: Toga-Fruit 2 4.0/6 1101== >5: ProDeo 1.1 Silver 3.5/6 11001= >6: Gothmog 1.0 b10 2.5/6 1=1000 > >Robert Maybe you need shorter time control. The tournament that Anmon won was blitz 10+3 There is no reason to believe that Anmon is better at longer time control. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.